The Jewish Brainwashing of the Evangelical Church

Recently a video has made the rounds on social media about U.S. President Donald Trump’s Attorney General Pam Bondi making an announcement about how she has prevailed in her aspiration to silence all negative talking about Judaism in educational institutions.

She made this speech at the Israeli-American Council (IAC) National Summit on January 16, 2026, in Hollywood, Florida. In the clip, Bondi discusses DOJ actions against “antisemitism”, including using the FACE Act to secure civil rights settlements with universities over alleged failures to address antisemitic conduct on campuses. She boasts that this is the first use of the FACE act since it’s passage in 1994 to protect a place of worship. Apparently all the places of Christian worship were unworthy of her notice. She specifically mentions:

• $200 million settlement from Columbia University for “violating civil rights of Jewish students”.
• $75 million from Northwestern University for “anti-Semitic conduct”.
• $60 million from Cornell University with provisions to halt “anti-Semitic conduct”.
• A full investigation into the University of California system for “systematic anti-Semitism”.

She frames these actions as part of broader Trump administration efforts, emphasizing that antisemitism has been “unchecked” for too long and praising collaborators like Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon (Civil Rights Division) and Education Secretary Linda McMahon. The video may be viewed here: https://youtube.com/shorts/gPDSSr1Mjwk An insightful analysis of this speech is given here: https://youtu.be/hk-R9RVziVA

Now doubtless my reader is so accustomed to this sort of Post-War Consensus rhetoric that it will seem entirely normative. And Evangelical Christians will doubtless be heaving sighs of relief over such developments as a great victory for the truth, for having thus protected “God’s Chosen People” from the satanic NAZI’s that are still living in the shadows of modern culture, which seems to be the greatest threat to America’s prosperity since we are all commanded to “Bless Israel” if we don’t want to be cursed of God. Just ask Ted Cruz. He’ll tell you all about it.

But I want to keep what could be a lengthy article on a needful subject, condensed to just a few points.

One, the entire theological system that has produced this fanatical and brainwashed loyalty is not only unsupported by scripture, but radically contrary to plain biblical teaching, and

Two, to point out the unbounded hypocrisy of such actions on the part of swooning evangelicals in their irrational support of such restrictions of free speech.

Firstly, then, may we briefly consider the theological system among Christians that has led to this bizarre paradigm of antichrist support while neglecting the Church of Jesus. Because the scriptures tell us who is intended by that term, “antichrist”, and it’s those who don’t believe in Jesus. “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father” (IJn.2:22-23, See IJn.4:3, 2Jn.7 also) Could that describe Judaism, perhaps? Despite so many who would gnash their teeth at it, yet who could argue with it? So when Judaism is referred to as “antichrist” religion, just know that it’s not a prejudice or blind animosity but an adherence to biblical teaching.

First, we are told explicitly that the covenant blessings given to Abraham were promised to his “seed”, not to his “seeds”. Paul is quite specific here, stating that God’s pronouncement of blessing was to one, and that this One seed was Christ, not the many “seeds” of the 12 tribes.  

The covenant promise reads: “And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.” (Gen.17:17)

And then, to whom does that promise refer?

“Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. (Gal.3:16)

To obviate this biblical truth, let us turn to an extremely perspicuous application of it found in Rom.9. In context Paul has stated that he could wish that himself were accursed for his brethren, the Israelites, naming then all the spiritual blessings and advantages that they had received. But then … if so blessed with these advantages, then how is it that these blessed ones are now accursed, such that Paul could wish himself accursed in their place? Would not that make the word of God of none effect? What happened to all the blessings he just named? But now they are “accursed”? The following verses resolve that question thus:  

“Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, they which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.” (Rom. 9:6-8)

No, it won’t make the word of God of none effect to have had such advantages and yet end up accursed, for the very simple and easily understood reason that it never was true in the first place that all the seed of Abraham were in covenant, because only the children of promise were counted for the seed, and not the natural offspring. And that is why Galatians chapter 3 ends with this verse: “And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” Who is Abraham’s covenant seed? Jesus Christ, and all those in Him. Bless them or be cursed. How upside down that no one ever thinks of blessing the actual regenerate saints and the church of God, or imagines that a failure to do so would be displeasing to God. No … it’s only antichrists they have been brainwashed into this demented jealousy for as they forget the saints of God, persecuted and slandered all over the world with no concern whatever.

The plain biblical answer to this dilemma is that only those born of God ever were the children of God. Ahab was not a child of God and was not in covenant. He was a reprobate and accursed, just like all unbelievers. Paul states it quite plainly that just because some are the seed of Abraham doesn’t make them children of God. Thus they are not “God’s chosen people” by mere genetics. Which is of course why Jesus spoke specifically to Israelites: “Ye must be born again”. Because natural generation was an infinite short fall of gospel regeneration. What Paul is affirming is the truth that it never was any different. That’s how it was then; that’s how it is now. “These are not the children of God” who are but natural children is his plain declaration. Has God cast away His people, then? Rom.11 gives the answer: He hath not cast away his people whom he foreknew”. Rom.11:2

Further on in this chapter (Rom.11:13-24) we are told that these “natural branches”, those merely naturally generated from Abraham, were “broken off” because of unbelief. So, they were broken off and driven off the land in 70 AD by the Roman general Titus because of “unbelief”. (Mat.23:32-29, Lk.19:43-44) But now that they’re in unbelief God has brought them back to the land, and it’s theirs. They were cut off for rejecting Jesus the Christ. But now that they’ve rejected Him, He’s brought them back. Make that make sense.

This truth is further confirmed by Gal.4:21-28 where we find the following passage:

“Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.”

Paul here makes a comparison between the two wives and two sons of Abraham (Sarah/Hagar & Isaac/Ishmael) and the two covenants of the law and the gospel. And just how was this similitude assigned? Paul likens those Jews born merely of natural generation to the bondmaid Hagar and her son Ishmael who was born of entirely natural means, and outside the Abrahamic covenant or promise, being yet in the bondage of unbelief and under the legal covenant of Sinai. Paul also likens believing Jews together with believing Gentiles as those born from above by supernatural generation, as being under the saving covenant of Grace, born, as it were, by the freewoman (Sarah) and by covenant promise like Isaac. This is quite plain, and will bear no other interpretation. And Paul’s conclusion? It’s this: “Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.” We are what Isaac was. The Church, made up of Jew and Gentile, made up of those born from above, is what Isaac was. Christians are what Isaac was, the children of promise. What dispensationalists are saying is more or less what Abraham had once said in ignorance, “Oh that Ishmael might live before thee”. (Gen.17:18) But Ishmael is not the heir of the Abrahamic covenant, and the apostle Paul here plainly assigns the status of unbelieving Jews to that of Ishmael, Hagar, Sinai, and bondage. Scripture affirms that “In Isaac shall thy seed be called” and this passage plainly assigns that place to Christians of every tribe. But of Hagar & Ishmael it says, “Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman” and it cites this passage in direct correlation to unbelieving Jews. (vs.30) Its basically the practical application of Galatians 3 verses 16 and 21. “Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.” “And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”

But who is it that the modern church has been brainwahsed into a fervent jealousy for? These saints from all nations? No, not that. Not at all. Let Christians be butchered anywhere around the globe, and they will say, “Oh, that’s unfortunate”. But let some people defend themselves against Zionist usurpations and espionage around the globe, and they’ll be ready for war to defend the poor persecuted Zionists. You see, Christian people have been subjected to this demonic psyop and have been sold this fanatical and irrational jealousy for a people who don’t even believe in Jesus, and in most cases are atheists, as being somehow the chosen people of God, as though being chosen of God had nothing to do with Jesus Christ, and as though the Abrahamic covenant were made with unbelievers. Such types would probably have been there supporting Korah, Dathan, and Abiram in their rebellion against Moses saying “Ye have killed the people of the Lord!” (Num.16)

Next let us consider that the popular claim typically asserted. It has come to be reckoned an unquestioned biblical truth that such as will bless the modern Jewish political state will be blessed of God. But this claim is preposterous and demonstrably false by any measure, especially by the measure of the fanatical dispensationalists themselves. Passing by the irrational leap from blessing a people to blessing a particular form of political existence, yet there there is something far more bizarre in such a claim. You see, modern dispensationalists have yet enough character to rightly weep and lament the great wickedness that our land has been given over to, and how it has been utterly forsaken of God by any just measure, and profundly cursed of God already, and is nearing some sort of catastrophic consummation of it’s woes. But wait Mr. Dispensationalist. Do not the billions that we give to Isntreal constitute “blessing” them? If these are “God’s chosen people” and they represent the proper constituents of the Abrahamic covenant, then how would not such support be blessing them? How would not fighting all their wars and killing millions on their behalf and sacrificing the bloom of our youth for them constitute “blessing” them? How is it, then, that we are not blessed with righteous institutions of education, law, justice, medicine, commerce, banking, literature, morality, and religious life?  Has this “promise” failed? Or do you have a perverse interpretation of the bible? So, let us rather count the “blessings” we have actually received, shall we?

We’re getting poisoned in our food, air, and water, and especially medicine; we’re having Satanist pedophiles force sex changes on children, even of Christians; we have children, already profoundly afflicted with a demonic removal from their parents, or even justly removed, then put in an infinitely more grave danger of being adopted by sodomites; we are forced to pay for a global plutocracy that has captured the wealth of earth by banking fraud and which has used our military to spread the same demonic system over all the globe; we have our children brainwashed into Satanists like them in an educational system school-mastered by HELL, we have our elections overthrown by voter fraud, our families decimated by an antichrist feminist agenda, smashing Christian families by baiting apostate women into divorce knowing that the demonic judiciary will not follow any semblance of biblical law, but will finance their usurpations; we have our race hated, despised, demonized, raped, and murdered by foreign hordes, and our daughters made into whores by every imaginable contrivance, and these adversaries now thirst for the final move of disarming us to finish the destruction, which in many states is well under way; we have our real estate system so corrupted that only some tiny percentage can afford to start a family with affordable housing. But hey! Look how blessed we are! Lets keep blessing Isntreal!

And yet we have idologicly blinded charlatans like John Hagee telling us that “The day America turns its back on Israel is the day God will turn His back on America”. Excuse me you intolerable dunce … but you apparently didn’t notice that God already has turned his back on America and cursed it! But Hagee is hardly alone. This brainwashed idiocy is in the popular ascendancy. Multitudes who abominate all these decimations of American culture as the summit of all evil still talk about how we’ll be blessed for supporting a foreign country made up of unbelievers that scripture makes perfectly clear are damned as unbelievers, and have no part of any covenant whatever. As for Jews that believe, they are Christians, and “accepted in the beloved” and are then but like any other regenerate child of God hoping in the merits of Christ for his/her salvation, which is alone the people that should posses their ultimate loyalty if they will count themselves among them.

Lastly on this point, consider a biblical case in point from 2 Chronicles. There we find the story of Jehoshaphat, King of Judah, whom the apostate idolatrous King of Israel, Ahab, invited to join him in a war against  Ramoth Gilead. To be very brief, Jehoshaphat did go to war with Ahab, and Ahab was slain, and Jehoshaphat narrowly escaped. And when Jehoshaphat got home we read the following account from 2Chronicles: “And Jehu the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him, and said to king Jehoshaphat, Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord.” (2Chron.19:2) But wait! I thought he’d be blessed if he would help a Jew in a military endeavor! Is the prophet Hanani wicked or something? Or is John Hagee? Are you? And this is a most precise parallel, in as much as the type of support is that very type which the US most abundantly grants to Isntreal: Military support. And thus we see why “wrath is upon us” from the Lord. NOT BLESSING, WRATH. So either affirm that we’re under wrath, or being blessed, but please stop saying both.

But all that was but leading up to this one short point, and it is this. Reader, I’d like to ask if you would please candidly let yourself imagine something with me.  Suppose you woke up tomorrow morning and Pam Bondi was making an announcement in a news briefing that huge universities had been successfully sued for hundreds of millions of dollars. For anti-caucasian speech. Or for antichristian speech. Or for both. What would you think of that? Like this:

• $200 million settlement from Columbia University for “violating civil rights of Caucasian students”.
• $75 million from Northwestern University for “anti-Christian conduct”.
• $60 million from Cornell University with provisions to halt “anti-Anglo conduct”.
• A full investigation into the University of California system for “systemic Loxism”.

Perhaps people would be encouraged that for once someone actually started protecting the people who built the entire system of Western culture, rather than constantly demonizing it. Perhaps some Christians might rejoice that someone is finally protecting the actual faith that so abundantly blessed the world on a thousand counts of actual blessing, rather than the wrath and cursing that we’ve chosen and received for promoting antichrists. Perhaps they would bring to mind the former times when we were once actually blessed for promoting the sacred truth of the Christian faith and again take hope in it’s returning to again bless the nations, by showing favor to the actual people and truth of God and not to those whom the bible calls “antichrists”. Or perhaps some would object to the violations of free speech. Unless they were such as felt that they couldn’t prosper upon the fruits of their own merits, and needed the powerful to protect their otherwise untenable status as equals.

But the sad truth is, that most people would view such a turn of events, not as a great blessing, but as an act of intolerable racism. Because it’s racism to even speak of giving such privileges to Caucasians or Christians; but it’s racism to fail to give them to Jews. God will curse you if you don’t support antichrists. What god is that, however, that curses you for not blessing antichrists? What god finds Christianity unworthy of blessing in any equal measure of jealousy? When only god’s chosen antichrist people are counted in the same degree worthy, we need not long ponder what god we are contemplating. And they don’t just “not believe” in Jesus. They “blaspheme that worthy name by which ye are called”.

But we must go one step further. We are assured that men will be cursed of God if they don’t bless “Israel”. But the bible clearly says that you will bring judgment to yourself if you DO bless, not just Israel, but any people who contradict and defy Him. Here: “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.” So Chistian Zionists tell you that you are obliged to bid such people godspeed. The bible commands you not to, and says you will be reckoned as having been a partaker of their evil deeds. That’s you my Christian Zionist reader. Literally no one will affirm that Judaism “abides in the doctrine of Christ” whom they rather blaspheme. And we see how ready Christian Zionists are to make rational judgments with from such a passage when contemplating Islam, Mormonism, JW’s, or any other faith when applying such passages, but Islam, Mormons, JW’s, etc. don’t own the media that moderns ignorantly spew into their homes every day, nor fill their pulpits with seminarians brainwashed in the same tenets. But we must go one step further, and hear a direct biblical cursing that Paul the apostle renders upon any such as would demand we bless such gospel deniers: “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” (Gal.1:8-9) Now who could that be? Will any aver that Judaism preaches the gospel when they deny and blaspheme Christ? No? Then Judaism is intended here (among others) and here Paul curses them.

And let us take Rom. 11:4 just one step further as well. Bring to mind the plea so often made of how tender the apostle Paul was to his own kinsmen, even wishing himself accursed for his brethren, the people of Israel. And here all the Zionist shills wax eloquent in heralding the beauty of the apostle’s love for his brethren, seeing in it an example of others to do as Paul and love the Jews and wish for their conversion. But while we should most certainly hope for the conversion of all men, yet such a thoughtless conclusion drawn from this example is humorously unequal. Paul loved his kinsmen enough to wish to be cursed for them. And this is somehow an example for us to go love someone else’s kinsmen. Well, no. That would be an example for white people to love white people and to long for their conversion above others, as Paul did for his. But this normative familial affection is deemed lovely, inspiring, and exemplary in Paul, yet how does it sound to my reader should Caucasians actually apply as Paul did? Like this: “I could wish that myself were accursed for my brethren the Caucasians.” Your average TV brainwashee would recoil in horror to think those words, and would never say them. Because he’s a pathetic slave of his enemies and his opinions are not formed from the bible but from his TV, and no degree of hypocrisy is feared by him so be that he has someone to clap for him.

It’s perfectly obvious that the only legitimate application of Paul’s example was for others to love their own kin above others and not that of Paul’s, just as Paul did with his kin, and not others. But if anyone says, “I would give anything just to see the conversion of white people”, what modern church would suffer him? What modern church would not think him an abominable racist? This summit of hypocrisy is now seen as the summit of orthodoxy. You will be applauded to be the epitome of a racist, so long as it’s a racist for Israel. My Christian Zionist reader … can you not see how warped and perfectly opposite the bible this brainwashing has made you? Is all your zeal for the bible a fraud and a show? Is it all for unchristian people with an unchristian agenda? Or will reality finally engage your consciousness in more than fantasy and enter the realm of reality and practicality here?

But what we rather see is that modern Christians are ready to risk everything to “bless” that which will curse them, and has. And that its the summit of all racism if we give such blessing to anyone else in equal measure, so as to call them cursed if they fail. Could you imagine a Christian saying that you would be cursed if you didn’t bless their church? If you ever thought to give this same preference to Christianity, or to that people that have most advanced it in the earth, heretic would be your name. Because in modern media-brainwashed culture if you are actually required to bless something worthy, its racist. It fails to pander to the envy of the inferior human elements of culture that have never produced anything like that of Europeans, or who have never prospered anywhere in their history but in a Caucasian country. Or they wouldn’t be desperate to risk everything to invade them illegally. Because they can’t prosper among their own people, and didn’t or they wouldn’t have so esteemed the case themselves by their own confession of desperation in leaving their homelands. But be sure they’re going to enrich us. And we are expected to be dutiful to ante up with the demanded measure of ethno-masochism and thus empower these hoards of social and genetic aliens so that they can be thus herded by antichrists into dismantling Christian culture, if by no other means, at the voting booth, which not a soul can deny is exactly what they’ve done. While the vast majority of Christians can only spew the egalitarianism they heard on the morning talk-shows and evening news. And this is the cause why antichrists love them. Not because they care about them, but because they care about destroying any place of Christian dominance, while stupid virtue-signaling Christians can only think of demonstrating how loving they are by thus abetting in the destruction of Christian culture, as though it were some indubitable duty to the biblical ethics. Should this satanic movement ever prevail, whoever is left will see just how much these hypocrites care for all the third-worlders they imported, who will then learn what racism and partiality really is and will long for the days of Caucasian mercies that they presently rail at as the summit of all evil.

Perhaps some who would view such an imagined news briefing would think that such legal actions would be in violation of that great American principle of “separation between church and state” that the constitution of the United States mentions not once. Unless of course it gave it’s favoritism to people who despise Christianity. That would be constitutional! Reader, look at yourself and your utter stupidity, how you’ve been brainwashed to be so profoundly and fanatically jealous for a people who have cursed you, persecute you, promote your destruction by a thousand means, not the least of which is by the promotion of mass immigration and replacement in every single European country, and only there. Click here to watch an activist Jew fully admit it: https://youtu.be/G45WthPTo24

Or in the same vein, Harrison H. Smith produced a video entitled, “The Eighth Front: Israel’s War on Reality” in which scores of Jews declare plainly their intention to wipe any reproof of Jews or Judaism off the face of the earth and to destroy European culture. This can be seen on X.com: https://x.com/HarrisonHSmith/status/2018753453544124833 Or, if you prefer, on YouTube: https://youtu.be/1tJqtO0Kywk In this video you will see scores of Jews stating their plans for you, including by not even close to limited to, their intention to start a new war with “Rome” (their term for Europe), but using the modern weapons of social media monitoring and persecution. They say this will mean getting them fired, getting them jailed, getting them publicly humiliated via online campaigns, being deplatformed from any place of influence, by infiltration, by “psychological operations”, by “controlling the media”, by using Artificial Intelligence, by “over two dozen Jewish organizations that are constantly feeding intelligence and information” to ringleaders, saying “we measure and track, we monitor and disrupt, I have forty analysts working full-time, seven days a week, 24-hours a day”, by “monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials”, by “co-writing Sunday-School curriculum”, and we’re only a little over four minutes in to the nearly fifteen minute video.

Now two HUGE questions emerge from this video. One, what are they doing that they even NEED such an apparatus to attempt to silence people from hating them? But secondly, please weigh the thought candidly, What would you think of any OTHER religion that had to prosecute such an immense propaganda campaign as necessary to make them look acceptable to the public? What people is so abhorrent that it takes laws to silence their criticism? What if Christians did that? What if it were Christians that were prosecuting such a bizarre campaign to defend themselves, what would you think of Christianity? What would you think if the Christian church utterly combined into this massive intelligence gathering network and sought to deplatform, jail, persecute, and get fired, anyone that said anything against Christianity or against Caucasians? What would you think of the latest Christian minister exposed in some scandal if instead of confessing his sin and taking the consequences, he instead started a massive media monitoring campaign that engaged the entirety of the Christian faith to persecute any that obviated the immoral behavior? These just think they get to assume their own innocence, and that you must assume it with them, and if you don’t you’re a NAZI and want to kill six million Jews.

This is what they will do rather than make any answer whatever for what people have said, and start persecuting any that articulate objectionable behavior. But what kind of religion is that? They just assume their innocence, as though some sinless race, and that it could only be persecution that points out little things like their genociding Palestinians, creating global financial, immigration, and political intrigue among European nations. What would you think of that, reader, if this was Christianity doing this? There is no question whatever that any normative sane Christian man would reprobate such want of humility or candor, and would have the character to provide some sort of defense or contrition, and that any other course would be deemed profoundly suspicious, especially if the one defended had been caught selling nuclear technology to Communists, or bribing hundreds of politicians or blackmailing them with scandal, or genociding an entire race while moaning as victims of genocide. Or for purchasing an Attorney General like Pam Bondi to go prosecute and sue anyone that started pointing it out.

Of course, the fact that Universities are en masse supporting genocide of Caucasians means nothing to Pam Bondi. Caucasians have pretty much but tried to tend to their own families, and upon the whole haven’t conspired to dominate the financial and academic world. They don’t have any representation, don’t control the media, don’t control banking, don’t control education, don’t control the central banks of the world, and can’t platform political whores like Bondi. So what political slut will bother to regard any measure of consistency whatever in protecting a race that can’t help them? Go watch this video and disagree if you can: https://x.com/1776General_/status/1895816887134797854 In this video you will see dozens of College newspapers calling for Caucasians to be exterminated, encouraging them to kill themselves, telling them that their DNA is an abomination, and a great many other maniacally genocidal utterances. Mrs. Bondi will care for none of these things. Because it’s not about that. It’s all about her promotion. But it won’t feel like that in hell. Or consider this video of dozens of Jewish Rabbis stating their intention to destroy Christianity and all Western culture. https://youtu.be/bBosX-hP_7s This is you’re “Judeo-Christian ethic” in its naked form, and Pam Bondi will be perfectly fine with it, because it’s what empowers her, and power is the only thing they care about at all, and everything else is just posturing and optics.

Neither Pam Bondi, Donald Trump, nor any of the other political prostitutes care anything for racism, nor for the plight of the persecuted. They care only for what empowers them. Which means that you have nobody, and are represented by no one; which was precisely the reason there was an American Revolution. And the biggest problem we have is that conservatives think they have people in their corner. However, you are perennially only given the choice between Satan and Lucifer, between driving off a cliff at 60 mph, or at 90. If you think that’s going to “Make America Great Again”, then perhaps you should open your eyes to all the “blessings”, and foresee that you’re destined to perfect ruin if you continue to virtue signal for antichrists, and will deserve it too for having no more care than these other traitors do, consulting only your popularity, and being unwilling to suffer anything for the truth, for liberty, or for the Christian faith and people.

I have a final word for all of you. Stop complaining about all these abominations while calling them blessings. You look like an idiot. “How long halt ye between two opinions?” If Christ be God, serve Him. If Antichrist, serve Him. But you look like total idiots to be calling yourself blessed and cursed all at the same time. And it would appear that most would be likely to actually oppose any true blessing that came to them, but only a blessing for antichrists. Yes, reader, bless Jesus, bless His people from every kindred tribe and tongue, or be cursed of God. Because they, and only they are God’s chosen people and in the covenant of Abraham. And will you please allow yourself to think on your own two feet, and stop consulting your popularity, and be willing to carry a cross for the truth, like Jesus demanded of those that are called by his name? Or just go serve Satan. Chose ye this day whom ye will serve. As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. (Josh.24:15)